PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Costs $540 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
✅Delivers 281.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 220W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-3323

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌76% higher power demand at 220W vs 125W.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon W-3323

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Costs $540 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
✅Delivers 281.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 220W, a 95W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌76% higher power demand at 220W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon W-3323?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3323 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 21.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 64.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $540 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $949 MSRP, and it gives you a 21.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 281.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 29.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3323 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3323
1080p
low	284 FPS	176 FPS
medium	268 FPS	140 FPS
high	223 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	146 FPS
medium	200 FPS	114 FPS
high	159 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	67 FPS
medium	134 FPS	56 FPS
high	103 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3323

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3323
1080p
low	689 FPS	447 FPS
medium	580 FPS	385 FPS
high	484 FPS	313 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	264 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	384 FPS
medium	525 FPS	342 FPS
high	441 FPS	283 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	234 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	246 FPS
medium	314 FPS	221 FPS
high	295 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	162 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3323

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3323
1080p
low	648 FPS	696 FPS
medium	530 FPS	696 FPS
high	467 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	696 FPS
medium	491 FPS	642 FPS
high	427 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	537 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	482 FPS
medium	374 FPS	377 FPS
high	339 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	273 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3323

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3323
1080p
low	970 FPS	696 FPS
medium	883 FPS	696 FPS
high	766 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	602 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	696 FPS
medium	740 FPS	615 FPS
high	642 FPS	533 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	458 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	482 FPS
medium	515 FPS	433 FPS
high	463 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	338 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3323

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon W-3323

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon W-3323

The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 48.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3323
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+38%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+67%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	45,784+65%	27,822
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3323
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3323 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3323
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3323 debuted at $949. On MSRP ($409 vs $949), the Core i7-13700K is $540 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Core i7-13700K the 117% better value option.