PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,040 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1132.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon W-3275M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3275M

2019

Why buy it

✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (40,419 vs 45,784).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon W-3275M

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,040 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1132.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon W-3275M needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (40,419 vs 45,784).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon W-3275M?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3275M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 13.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $4,040 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $4,449 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1132.2% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 28/56. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3275M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	284 FPS	198 FPS
medium	268 FPS	162 FPS
high	223 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	159 FPS
medium	200 FPS	125 FPS
high	159 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	87 FPS
medium	134 FPS	74 FPS
high	103 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	47 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3275M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	689 FPS	607 FPS
medium	580 FPS	522 FPS
high	484 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	371 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	514 FPS
medium	525 FPS	447 FPS
high	441 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	306 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	306 FPS
medium	314 FPS	266 FPS
high	295 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	213 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3275M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	648 FPS	1010 FPS
medium	530 FPS	928 FPS
high	467 FPS	876 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	793 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	808 FPS
medium	491 FPS	715 FPS
high	427 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	605 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	519 FPS
medium	374 FPS	429 FPS
high	339 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	315 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3275M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	970 FPS	1010 FPS
medium	883 FPS	1010 FPS
high	766 FPS	885 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	773 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	932 FPS
medium	740 FPS	804 FPS
high	642 FPS	702 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	680 FPS
medium	515 FPS	591 FPS
high	463 FPS	521 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-3275M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon W-3275M

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon W-3275M

The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3275M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3275M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon W-3275M's 40,419 — a 12.4% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3275M
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+17%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+36%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	38.5 MB+28%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	28 MB+1300%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	45,784+13%	40,419
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3275M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M — the Xeon W-3275M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275M) — the Xeon W-3275M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and C620 (Xeon W-3275M).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3275M
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	2933+58560%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+9830300%	2048
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3275M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275M). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3275M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-3275M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275M debuted at $4449. On MSRP ($409 vs $4449), the Core i7-13700K is $4040 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275M — making the Core i7-13700K the 170% better value option.