PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Costs $924 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 426.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2191B, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2191B

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,362 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon W-2191B

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Costs $924 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 426.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2191B, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,362 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon W-2191B?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2191B makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.5% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 61.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 21.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $924 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $1,333 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.5% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 426.1% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 21.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, 21.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 18/36. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2191B Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	284 FPS	168 FPS
medium	268 FPS	147 FPS
high	223 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	140 FPS
medium	200 FPS	119 FPS
high	159 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	74 FPS
medium	134 FPS	67 FPS
high	103 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	41 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-2191B

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	689 FPS	430 FPS
medium	580 FPS	380 FPS
high	484 FPS	331 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	301 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	378 FPS
medium	525 FPS	339 FPS
high	441 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	260 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	247 FPS
medium	314 FPS	220 FPS
high	295 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	181 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-2191B

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	648 FPS	709 FPS
medium	530 FPS	709 FPS
high	467 FPS	709 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	658 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	709 FPS
medium	491 FPS	693 FPS
high	427 FPS	641 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	567 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	511 FPS
medium	374 FPS	426 FPS
high	339 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	318 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-2191B

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	970 FPS	709 FPS
medium	883 FPS	709 FPS
high	766 FPS	709 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	675 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	709 FPS
medium	740 FPS	709 FPS
high	642 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	553 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	615 FPS
medium	515 FPS	549 FPS
high	463 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	407 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-2191B

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon W-2191B

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon W-2191B

The Xeon W-2191B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,362 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-2191B offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2191B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2191B — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2191B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon W-2191B's 28,362 — a 47% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2191B.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-2191B
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	18 / 36+13%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+26%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+48%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+21%	24.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	45,784+61%	28,362
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2191B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2191B — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2191B supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Xeon W-2191B). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 48 (Xeon W-2191B) — the Xeon W-2191B offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-2191B
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	512 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-2191B supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2191B). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-2191B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-2191B targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-2191B
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2191B debuted at $1333. On MSRP ($409 vs $1333), the Core i7-13700K is $924 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 21.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2191B — making the Core i7-13700K the 136.1% better value option.