PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon W-10855M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
246.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$118 MSRP
❌8233.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 1.5W.

Xeon W-10855M

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $291 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 124W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon W-10855M

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon W-10855M needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $291 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 124W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
246.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$118 MSRP
❌8233.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 1.5W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon W-10855M?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-10855M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 58.8% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 273.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 246.6% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $118 MSRP, and it gives you a 58.8% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 7.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 103.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon W-10855M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-10855M
1080p
low	284 FPS	275 FPS
medium	268 FPS	243 FPS
high	223 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	175 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	235 FPS
medium	200 FPS	187 FPS
high	159 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	135 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	163 FPS
medium	134 FPS	132 FPS
high	103 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	89 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-10855M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-10855M
1080p
low	689 FPS	306 FPS
medium	580 FPS	280 FPS
high	484 FPS	254 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	221 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	300 FPS
medium	525 FPS	245 FPS
high	441 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	194 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	251 FPS
medium	314 FPS	207 FPS
high	295 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	159 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-10855M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-10855M
1080p
low	648 FPS	306 FPS
medium	530 FPS	306 FPS
high	467 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	306 FPS
medium	491 FPS	306 FPS
high	427 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	306 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	306 FPS
medium	374 FPS	306 FPS
high	339 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	294 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-10855M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-10855M
1080p
low	970 FPS	306 FPS
medium	883 FPS	306 FPS
high	766 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	306 FPS
medium	740 FPS	306 FPS
high	642 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	306 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	306 FPS
medium	515 FPS	306 FPS
high	463 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	306 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-10855M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon W-10855M

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon W-10855M

The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 115.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-10855M
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+10%	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+150%	12 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+33%	1.5 MB
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	45,784+274%	12,249
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-10855M
Socket	LGA1700	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Xeon W-10855M). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-10855M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-10855M
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon W-10855M debuted at $118. On MSRP ($409 vs $118), the Xeon W-10855M is $291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-10855M — making the Core i7-13700K the 7.5% better value option.