PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Platinum 8180M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8180M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8180M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Platinum 8180M

2017

Why buy it

✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (25,000 vs 31,000).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon Platinum 8180M

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Platinum 8180M needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8180M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8180M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (25,000 vs 31,000).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon Platinum 8180M?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8180M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 24% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is at an unclear MSRP at $409 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 28/56. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8180M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8180M
1080p
low	284 FPS	192 FPS
medium	268 FPS	156 FPS
high	223 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	158 FPS
medium	200 FPS	124 FPS
high	159 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	72 FPS
medium	134 FPS	60 FPS
high	103 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8180M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8180M
1080p
low	689 FPS	442 FPS
medium	580 FPS	386 FPS
high	484 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	381 FPS
medium	525 FPS	336 FPS
high	441 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	220 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	238 FPS
medium	314 FPS	211 FPS
high	295 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	154 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8180M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8180M
1080p
low	648 FPS	758 FPS
medium	530 FPS	758 FPS
high	467 FPS	758 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	758 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	722 FPS
medium	491 FPS	626 FPS
high	427 FPS	595 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	462 FPS
medium	374 FPS	365 FPS
high	339 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	267 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8180M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8180M
1080p
low	970 FPS	758 FPS
medium	883 FPS	758 FPS
high	766 FPS	733 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	636 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	738 FPS
medium	740 FPS	647 FPS
high	642 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	476 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	532 FPS
medium	515 FPS	474 FPS
high	463 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	360 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8180M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon Platinum 8180M

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Platinum 8180M

The Xeon Platinum 8180M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 30,313 points. Launch price was $13,011.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180M — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon Platinum 8180M's 30,313 — a 40.7% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 25,000 (21.4% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,000, a 96% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 21,854 (14.1% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180M). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180M.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8180M
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+42%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+36%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	38.5 MB (total)+28%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	45,784+51%	30,313
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000+24%	25,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+185%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	21,854+15%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180M — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8180M supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180M) — the Xeon Platinum 8180M offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and C620 (Xeon Platinum 8180M).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8180M
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1536 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8180M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8180M). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8180M targets Mission Critical Datacenter. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Platinum 8180M rivals EPYC 7551.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8180M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Mission Critical Datacenter