
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6137
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-13700K
2022Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon Gold 6137?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon Gold 6137

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 27.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-13700K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 81.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+32% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+20% | 25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 45,784+136% | 19,365 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6137). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6137 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













