PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,012 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
✅Delivers 391.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6741P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (30 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 100,660).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6741P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 136 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 288 MB vs 30 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 136 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅580% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,012 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
✅Delivers 391.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6741P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 288 MB vs 30 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 136 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅580% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (30 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 100,660).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6741P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 136 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6741P better than Core i7-13700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6741P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6741P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 288 MB vs 30 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6741P is the better fit. You are getting 119.9% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6741P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6741P is 980.9% more expensive on MSRP at $4,421 MSRP versus $409 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700K is also 391.6% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6741P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 288 MB L3 cache instead of 30 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 16/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon 6741P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	284 FPS	187 FPS
medium	268 FPS	165 FPS
high	223 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	155 FPS
medium	200 FPS	131 FPS
high	159 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	70 FPS
medium	134 FPS	63 FPS
high	103 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6741P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	689 FPS	520 FPS
medium	580 FPS	460 FPS
high	484 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	425 FPS
medium	525 FPS	383 FPS
high	441 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	262 FPS
medium	314 FPS	239 FPS
high	295 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6741P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	648 FPS	849 FPS
medium	530 FPS	768 FPS
high	467 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	737 FPS
medium	491 FPS	662 FPS
high	427 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	493 FPS
medium	374 FPS	402 FPS
high	339 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6741P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	970 FPS	978 FPS
medium	883 FPS	883 FPS
high	766 FPS	763 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	659 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	800 FPS
medium	740 FPS	698 FPS
high	642 FPS	601 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	514 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	574 FPS
medium	515 FPS	516 FPS
high	463 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	395 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6741P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon 6741P

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon 6741P

The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6741P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6741P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6741P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon 6741P's 100,660 — a 74.9% lead for the Xeon 6741P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 3,195, a 11.6% lead for the Xeon 6741P that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6741P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	48 / 96+200%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+42%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+36%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+860%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	45,784	100,660+120%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	3,195+12%
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6741P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Xeon 6741P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 136 (Xeon 6741P) — the Xeon 6741P offers 116 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6741P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4 TB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	136+580%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6741P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6741P targets Data Center. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6741P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	—	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon 6741P debuted at $4421. On MSRP ($409 vs $4421), the Core i7-13700K is $4012 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6741P — making the Core i7-13700K the 132.4% better value option.