
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+89.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $6,090 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 667.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 280W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 66,403).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+114.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,500 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌124% higher power demand at 280W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+89.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $6,090 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 667.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 280W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+114.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 66,403).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,500 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌124% higher power demand at 280W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 648 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 920 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1160 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 894 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 790 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 69.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 66,403 (72.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,500, a 61.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 20,000 (5.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 64 / 128+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+20% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+26% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 256 MB+753% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 94,737+107% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | 66,403+114% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+90% | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | 20,000+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Both support true virtualization. The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | — | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX debuted at $6499. On MSRP ($409 vs $6499), the Core i7-13700K is $6090 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the Core i7-13700K the 153.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-94% | $6499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+666% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












