PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $590 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 306.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 18,980).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $590 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 306.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 18,980).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 110.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $590 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 306.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	284 FPS	198 FPS
medium	268 FPS	172 FPS
high	223 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	155 FPS
medium	200 FPS	129 FPS
high	159 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	69 FPS
medium	134 FPS	61 FPS
high	103 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	689 FPS	407 FPS
medium	580 FPS	365 FPS
high	484 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	348 FPS
medium	525 FPS	318 FPS
high	441 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	224 FPS
medium	314 FPS	204 FPS
high	295 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	150 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	648 FPS	687 FPS
medium	530 FPS	687 FPS
high	467 FPS	687 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	687 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	687 FPS
medium	491 FPS	687 FPS
high	427 FPS	656 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	584 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	519 FPS
medium	374 FPS	428 FPS
high	339 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	321 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	970 FPS	687 FPS
medium	883 FPS	687 FPS
high	766 FPS	687 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	640 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	687 FPS
medium	740 FPS	687 FPS
high	642 FPS	611 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	578 FPS
medium	515 FPS	517 FPS
high	463 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 49.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,040, a 92.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 9,000 (71.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+35%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	45,784+67%	27,487
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+174%	1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980+111%	9,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X debuted at $999. On MSRP ($409 vs $999), the Core i7-13700K is $590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — making the Core i7-13700K the 121.1% better value option.