PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.3% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 150.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
24.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.3% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 150.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
24.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 35.3% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data, 211.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 35.3% more average FPS across 41 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 211.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 24.3% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 35.3% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 150.6% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 44.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	284 FPS	176 FPS
medium	268 FPS	154 FPS
high	223 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	145 FPS
medium	200 FPS	121 FPS
high	159 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	66 FPS
medium	134 FPS	59 FPS
high	103 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	689 FPS	286 FPS
medium	580 FPS	253 FPS
high	484 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	253 FPS
medium	525 FPS	229 FPS
high	441 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	167 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	183 FPS
medium	314 FPS	170 FPS
high	295 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	124 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	648 FPS	367 FPS
medium	530 FPS	367 FPS
high	467 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	367 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	367 FPS
medium	491 FPS	367 FPS
high	427 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	319 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	363 FPS
medium	374 FPS	295 FPS
high	339 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	214 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	970 FPS	367 FPS
medium	883 FPS	367 FPS
high	766 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	367 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	367 FPS
medium	740 FPS	367 FPS
high	642 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	367 FPS
medium	515 FPS	367 FPS
high	463 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	313 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 102.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+46%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+88%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	45,784+211%	14,699
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($409 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is $80 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Core i7-13700K the 85.9% better value option.