
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8645HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,316 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,316 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 5 8645HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 520 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 5 8645HS

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 5 8645HS
Ryzen 5 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8645HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 5 8645HS's 22,257 — a 69.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 13,316 (79.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,574, a 10% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 10,675 (56% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784+106% | 22,257 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+133% | 13,316 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+11% | 2,574 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+78% | 10,675 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 8645HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SoC (Ryzen 5 8645HS).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 8645HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 8645HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












