
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7645HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7645HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,985 vs 31,000).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7645HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,985 vs 31,000).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 5 7645HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 638 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 5 7645HX

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 5 7645HX
Ryzen 5 7645HX
The Ryzen 5 7645HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,097 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7645HX offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7645HX — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 5 7645HX's 26,097 — a 54.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 13,985 (75.6% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,588, a 9.5% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 11,717 (47.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7645HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784+75% | 26,097 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+122% | 13,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+10% | 2,588 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+62% | 11,717 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) — the Ryzen 5 7645HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SoC (Ryzen 5 7645HX).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7645HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 7645HX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 5 7645HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7645HX targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 5 7645HX rivals Core i5-13500HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












