
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

M2 Max
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 48 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- β +60% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 30 MB).
- β Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (26,824 vs 45,784).
Core i7-13700K
2022M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- β +60% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 30 MB).
- β Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 48 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (26,824 vs 45,784).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than M2 Max?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 670 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 668 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 489 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 368 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and M2 Max

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
M2 Max
M2 Max
The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads β the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max β a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i7-13700K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the M2 Max's 26,824 β a 52.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+46% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+40% | 2.424 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 48 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 36 MB+1700% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 45,784+71% | 26,824 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB β 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 0 (M2 Max) β the Core i7-13700K offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+100% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics β Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Apple M2 Max GPU |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Virtualization |
| Target Use | β | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













