Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 9845

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 9845

160 Cores320 Thrd390 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2024

Popular choices:

••••••••i7-13700K•

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-13700K

16 / 24

45,784

0.0%

152,985

+234.1%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $13,155 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Delivers 892.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 390W, a 265W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9845 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 152,985).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9845, which brings 160 cores / 320 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9845

2024

Why buy it

✅+234.1% higher PassMark.
✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 160 cores / 320 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌212% higher power demand at 390W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

EPYC 9845

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $13,155 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Delivers 892.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 390W, a 265W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9845 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+234.1% higher PassMark.
✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 160 cores / 320 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 152,985).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9845, which brings 160 cores / 320 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌212% higher power demand at 390W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9845 better than Core i7-13700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9845 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9845 is the better fit. You are getting 234.1% better PassMark, backed by 160 cores and 320 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9845 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9845 is 3216.4% more expensive on MSRP at $13,564 MSRP versus $409 MSRP, and it gives you 234.1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i7-13700K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700K is also 892.5% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 11.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9845 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 966.7% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 30 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 160 cores / 320 threads instead of 16/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 9845 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	284 FPS	192 FPS
medium	268 FPS	156 FPS
high	223 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	158 FPS
medium	200 FPS	124 FPS
high	159 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	72 FPS
medium	134 FPS	60 FPS
high	103 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9845

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	689 FPS	274 FPS
medium	580 FPS	241 FPS
high	484 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	225 FPS
medium	525 FPS	202 FPS
high	441 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	139 FPS
medium	314 FPS	128 FPS
high	295 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	96 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9845

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	648 FPS	743 FPS
medium	530 FPS	610 FPS
high	467 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	481 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	594 FPS
medium	491 FPS	494 FPS
high	427 FPS	450 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	390 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	430 FPS
medium	374 FPS	335 FPS
high	339 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	240 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9845

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	970 FPS	958 FPS
medium	883 FPS	869 FPS
high	766 FPS	746 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	646 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	739 FPS
medium	740 FPS	646 FPS
high	642 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	473 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	530 FPS
medium	515 FPS	474 FPS
high	463 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	358 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9845

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 9845

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 9845

The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9845 offers 160 cores / 320 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 144 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9845 uses Turin (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 9845's 152,985 — a 107.9% lead for the EPYC 9845. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9845
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	160 / 320+900%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+46%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+62%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	320 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	45,784	152,985+234%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9845 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 12 (EPYC 9845). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (EPYC 9845) — the EPYC 9845 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SP5 (EPYC 9845).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9845
Socket	LGA1700	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	6 TB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9845). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9845 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9845
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	—	Data Center / AI Training

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 9845 debuted at $13564. On MSRP ($409 vs $13564), the Core i7-13700K is $13155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9845 — making the Core i7-13700K the 163.4% better value option.