Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 9384X

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 9384X

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

••••••••i7-13700K•

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-13700K

16 / 24

45,784

0.0%

72,121

+57.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,120 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 758.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9384X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 72,121).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9384X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9384X

2023

Why buy it

✅+57.5% higher PassMark.
✅+2460% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

EPYC 9384X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,120 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 758.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9384X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+57.5% higher PassMark.
✅+2460% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 72,121).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9384X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than EPYC 9384X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9384X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X is the better fit. You are getting 57.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 2460% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $5,120 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $5,529 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9384X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 57.5% better PassMark. It is also 758.2% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9384X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 2460% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 30 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 16/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 9384X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9384X
1080p
low	284 FPS	171 FPS
medium	268 FPS	141 FPS
high	223 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	148 FPS
medium	200 FPS	120 FPS
high	159 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	70 FPS
medium	134 FPS	59 FPS
high	103 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9384X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9384X
1080p
low	689 FPS	507 FPS
medium	580 FPS	443 FPS
high	484 FPS	355 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	288 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	417 FPS
medium	525 FPS	373 FPS
high	441 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	243 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	257 FPS
medium	314 FPS	234 FPS
high	295 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	171 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9384X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9384X
1080p
low	648 FPS	670 FPS
medium	530 FPS	559 FPS
high	467 FPS	521 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	453 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	510 FPS
medium	491 FPS	424 FPS
high	427 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	336 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	376 FPS
medium	374 FPS	294 FPS
high	339 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	210 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9384X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9384X
1080p
low	970 FPS	904 FPS
medium	883 FPS	822 FPS
high	766 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	625 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	721 FPS
medium	740 FPS	629 FPS
high	642 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	518 FPS
medium	515 FPS	462 FPS
high	463 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	349 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9384X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 9384X

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 9384X

The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9384X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9384X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9384X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 44.7% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9384X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+38%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+10%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	768 MB (total)+2460%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Genoa-X (2023)
PassMark	45,784	72,121+58%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9384X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 4800 on the EPYC 9384X — the EPYC 9384X supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 12 (EPYC 9384X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (EPYC 9384X) — the EPYC 9384X offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9384X
Socket	LGA1700	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+3276700%	6144
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9384X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9384X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9384X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 9384X debuted at $5529. On MSRP ($409 vs $5529), the Core i7-13700K is $5120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9384X — making the Core i7-13700K the 158.3% better value option.