
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 258 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 7 165H

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Core Ultra 7 165H's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 55.7% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 22 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+25% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784+77% | 25,849 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 165H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













