
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 245
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (40,165 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (40,165 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core Ultra 5 245?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 668 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 256 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 730 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 324 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1004 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 956 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 834 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 758 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 764 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 417 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 245

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 5 245
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245 offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core Ultra 5 245's 40,165 — a 13.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+14% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+25% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+14% | 40,165 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+78643100% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 245 debuted at $319. On MSRP ($409 vs $319), the Core Ultra 5 245 is $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245 — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 11.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $319-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9 | 125.9+13% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













