
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Core i9-13900T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,735 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 77.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-13700K
2022Core i9-13900T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,735 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 77.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i9-13900T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 112 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 761 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 328 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1004 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 897 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 785 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 833 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 733 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 640 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-13900T

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-13900T
Core i9-13900T
The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-13900T offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-13900T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-13900T's 42,735 — a 6.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 32+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+2% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+209% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784+7% | 42,735 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 5600 on the Core i9-13900T — the Core i9-13900T supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+104857500% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-13900T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900T debuted at $549. On MSRP ($409 vs $549), the Core i7-13700K is $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 77.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900T — making the Core i7-13700K the 35.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-26% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+44% | 77.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













