
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 40,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
Core i9-13900K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 97.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-13700K
2022Core i9-13900K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 40,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 97.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900K better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 112 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 270 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 628 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1034 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 926 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 812 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 722 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 757 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-13900K

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K
The Core i9-13900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 58,373 points. Launch price was $589.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-13900K offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900K — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-13900K's 58,373 — a 24.2% lead for the Core i9-13900K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 40,000 (25.4% advantage for the Core i9-13900K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,985, a 4.8% lead for the Core i9-13900K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 19,967 (5.1% advantage for the Core i9-13900K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 32+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 58,373+27% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | 40,000+29% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | 2,985+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | 19,967+5% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900K).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900K debuted at $599. On MSRP ($409 vs $599), the Core i7-13700K is $190 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 97.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900K — making the Core i7-13700K the 13.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-32% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+15% | 97.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













