
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $208 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $208 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i9-13900H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 246 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 686 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-13900H

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H
The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-13900H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-13900H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-13900H's 27,444 — a 50.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+14% | 14 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+31% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+25% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784+67% | 27,444 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-13900H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Core i9-13900H). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-13900H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900H debuted at $617. On MSRP ($409 vs $617), the Core i7-13700K is $208 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 44.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900H — making the Core i7-13700K the 86.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-34% | $617 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+151% | 44.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













