
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-10940X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+55.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $375 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 217.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 35.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-10940X
2019Why buy it
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($784 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
Core i7-13700K
2022Core i9-10940X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+55.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $375 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 217.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 35.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.3 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($784 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i9-10940X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 197 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 692 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 373 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 692 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 560 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 408 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-10940X

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-10940X
Core i9-10940X
The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-10940X offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10940X uses Cascade Lake-X (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-10940X's 27,684 — a 49.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 19,000 (48% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,450, a 65% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 11,000 (53.2% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+14% | 14 / 28 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+56% | 19.25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Cascade Lake-X (2019) |
| PassMark | 45,784+65% | 27,684 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+63% | 19,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+96% | 1,450 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+73% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10940X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10940X — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10940X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Core i9-10940X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 48 (Core i9-10940X) — the Core i9-10940X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and X299 (Core i9-10940X).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-10940X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10940X). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-10940X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10940X targets High-End Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High-End Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-10940X debuted at $784. On MSRP ($409 vs $784), the Core i7-13700K is $375 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 35.3 pts/$ for the Core i9-10940X — making the Core i7-13700K the 104.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-48% | $784 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+217% | 35.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













