
Core i5-13600H
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,857 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i5-13600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Core i5-13600H
2023Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,857 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i5-13600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i5-13600H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600H and Core i7-13700K

Core i5-13600H
Core i5-13600H
The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 65.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,857 vs 31,000 (70.4% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,423 vs 2,846, a 16.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,684 vs 18,980 (64.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 16 / 24+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,291 | 45,784+97% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,857 | 31,000+109% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,423 | 2,846+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,684 | 18,980+96% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i5-13600H) vs 20 (Core i7-13700K) — the Core i5-13600H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 192 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) vs true (Core i7-13700K). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Core i5-13600H) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS; Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | High performance laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













