
Core i5-13400
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,769 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.1% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$221 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core i5-13400
2023Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,769 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.1% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$221 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i5-13400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 594 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400 and Core i7-13700K

Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
The Core i5-13400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,769 points. Launch price was $221.

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400 packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400 scores 23,769 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 63.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 24+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,769 | 45,784+93% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13400) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400 launched at $221 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($221 vs $409), the Core i5-13400 is $188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400 delivers 107.6 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221-46% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.6 | 111.9+4% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












