
Core i5-12600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12600K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,472 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 95.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+15.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Delivers 17.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 95.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌41.5% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
Core i5-12600K
2021Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+15.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Delivers 17.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 95.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,472 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 95.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌41.5% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i5-12600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 577 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 635 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 476 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 690 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 644 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 599 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12600K and Core i7-13700K

Core i5-12600K
Core i5-12600K
The Core i5-12600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,586 points. Launch price was $289.

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12600K packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-12600K versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-12600K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12600K scores 27,586 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 49.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 31,000 (55.7% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,472 vs 2,846, a 14.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,863 vs 18,980 (46.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-12600K vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 24+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 27,586 | 45,784+66% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | 31,000+77% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,472 | 2,846+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,863 | 18,980+60% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i5-12600K versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K — the Core i5-12600K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i5-12600K) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 192 GB+157286300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12600K) vs true (Core i7-13700K). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-12600K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12600K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600K rivals Ryzen 5 5600X; Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12600K launched at $289 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($289 vs $409), the Core i5-12600K is $120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12600K delivers 95.5 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 15.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-29% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 95.5 | 111.9+17% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













