PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-14100F

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 141.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 125W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,381 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i3-14100F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 141.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌115.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 58W.

Core i3-14100F

2024

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 141.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 125W, a 67W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i3-14100F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,381 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 141.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌115.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 58W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i3-14100F?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 38.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 197.7% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 38.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 197.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-14100F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13700K is 275.2% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it gives you a 38.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-14100F is also 26.1% better value on MSRP (141.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-14100F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i3-14100F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i3-14100F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	172 FPS	284 FPS
medium	147 FPS	268 FPS
high	116 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	238 FPS
medium	124 FPS	200 FPS
high	98 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	159 FPS
medium	75 FPS	134 FPS
high	59 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i3-14100F Open Core i7-13700K

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i3-14100F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	318 FPS	689 FPS
medium	265 FPS	580 FPS
high	239 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	273 FPS	595 FPS
medium	233 FPS	525 FPS
high	215 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	348 FPS
medium	178 FPS	314 FPS
high	153 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	261 FPS

Open Core i3-14100F Open Core i7-13700K

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i3-14100F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	385 FPS	648 FPS
medium	385 FPS	530 FPS
high	385 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	385 FPS	591 FPS
medium	385 FPS	491 FPS
high	385 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	371 FPS
4K
low	385 FPS	434 FPS
medium	385 FPS	374 FPS
high	371 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	290 FPS

Open Core i3-14100F Open Core i7-13700K

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i3-14100F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	385 FPS	970 FPS
medium	385 FPS	883 FPS
high	385 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	689 FPS
1440p
low	385 FPS	829 FPS
medium	385 FPS	740 FPS
high	385 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	385 FPS	567 FPS
medium	385 FPS	515 FPS
high	385 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	404 FPS

Open Core i3-14100F Open Core i7-13700K

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-14100F and Core i7-13700K

Core i3-14100F

The Core i3-14100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,381 points. Launch price was $109.

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-14100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-14100F versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-14100F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-14100F scores 15,381 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 99.4% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-14100F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Core i7-13700K
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 24+300%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	5.4 GHz+15%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark	15,381	45,784+198%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,846
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,980

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Core i7-13700K
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	—	192 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-14100F) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i3-14100F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Core i7-13700K
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-14100F launched at $109 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($109 vs $409), the Core i3-14100F is $300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-14100F delivers 141.1 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i3-14100F the 23.1% better value option.