Core 7 160UL vs Core i7-13700K

Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i7-13700K
VS
Intel

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 7 160UL

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 45,784).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +96.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 7 160UL needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core 7 160UL?
Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 96.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 314.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 96.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 314.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is at an unclear MSRP at $409 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 96.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 160UL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 7 160ULCore i7-13700K
1080p
low262 FPS284 FPS
medium234 FPS268 FPS
high200 FPS223 FPS
ultra171 FPS190 FPS
1440p
low224 FPS238 FPS
medium180 FPS200 FPS
high149 FPS159 FPS
ultra131 FPS139 FPS
4K
low157 FPS159 FPS
medium127 FPS134 FPS
high98 FPS103 FPS
ultra85 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 7 160ULCore i7-13700K
1080p
low228 FPS689 FPS
medium193 FPS580 FPS
high175 FPS484 FPS
ultra154 FPS439 FPS
1440p
low204 FPS595 FPS
medium179 FPS525 FPS
high162 FPS441 FPS
ultra137 FPS378 FPS
4K
low152 FPS348 FPS
medium140 FPS314 FPS
high133 FPS295 FPS
ultra114 FPS261 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 7 160ULCore i7-13700K
1080p
low276 FPS648 FPS
medium276 FPS530 FPS
high276 FPS467 FPS
ultra276 FPS405 FPS
1440p
low276 FPS591 FPS
medium276 FPS491 FPS
high276 FPS427 FPS
ultra276 FPS371 FPS
4K
low276 FPS434 FPS
medium276 FPS374 FPS
high276 FPS339 FPS
ultra276 FPS290 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 7 160ULCore i7-13700K
1080p
low276 FPS970 FPS
medium276 FPS883 FPS
high276 FPS766 FPS
ultra276 FPS689 FPS
1440p
low276 FPS829 FPS
medium276 FPS740 FPS
high276 FPS642 FPS
ultra276 FPS566 FPS
4K
low276 FPS567 FPS
medium276 FPS515 FPS
high276 FPS463 FPS
ultra276 FPS404 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and Core i7-13700K

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 122.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.

FeatureCore 7 160ULCore i7-13700K
Cores / Threads
10 / 12
16 / 24+60%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz
5.4 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+89%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark
11,043
45,784+315%
Cinebench R23 Multi
31,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,846
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,980
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore 7 160ULCore i7-13700K
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 160UL) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 7 160UL requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

FeatureCore 7 160ULCore i7-13700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true