PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +70.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 135W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-4667 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
✅Costs $281 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 34,347).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +70.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 135W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-4667 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
✅Costs $281 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 34,347).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12700K better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-12700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-12700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 70.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700K is the better fit. You are getting 123.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12700K is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-12700K is 219.5% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it gives you a 70.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 43.2% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 84.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 20 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-12700K Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4667 v3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	314 FPS	175 FPS
medium	295 FPS	151 FPS
high	246 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	269 FPS	147 FPS
medium	225 FPS	123 FPS
high	182 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	68 FPS
medium	142 FPS	61 FPS
high	109 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	630 FPS	212 FPS
medium	533 FPS	193 FPS
high	450 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	410 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	536 FPS	183 FPS
medium	475 FPS	166 FPS
high	403 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	312 FPS	115 FPS
medium	280 FPS	106 FPS
high	266 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	74 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	797 FPS	385 FPS
medium	633 FPS	385 FPS
high	556 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	472 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	704 FPS	385 FPS
medium	565 FPS	385 FPS
high	490 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	510 FPS	385 FPS
medium	425 FPS	359 FPS
high	381 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	321 FPS	270 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	859 FPS	385 FPS
medium	802 FPS	385 FPS
high	699 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	628 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	760 FPS	385 FPS
medium	678 FPS	385 FPS
high	590 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	385 FPS
medium	488 FPS	385 FPS
high	437 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	358 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Xeon E5-4667 v3

Core i7-12700K

The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 53.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 76.2% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	12 / 20	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+72%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	34,347+123%	15,397

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v3). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 debuted at $128. On MSRP ($409 vs $128), the Xeon E5-4667 v3 is $281 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4667 v3 the 35.6% better value option.