PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+120% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,759 vs 34,347).
❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+120% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,759 vs 34,347).
❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12700K better than Xeon E5-2699A v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2699A v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-12700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-12700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700K is the better fit. You are getting 28.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-12700K is at an unclear MSRP at $409 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 19.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (84.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 20 threads instead of 22/44. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-12700K Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2699A v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	314 FPS	183 FPS
medium	295 FPS	161 FPS
high	246 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	269 FPS	153 FPS
medium	225 FPS	129 FPS
high	182 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	69 FPS
medium	142 FPS	62 FPS
high	109 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	630 FPS	364 FPS
medium	533 FPS	330 FPS
high	450 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	410 FPS	226 FPS
1440p
low	536 FPS	313 FPS
medium	475 FPS	284 FPS
high	403 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	312 FPS	195 FPS
medium	280 FPS	178 FPS
high	266 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	121 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	797 FPS	669 FPS
medium	633 FPS	669 FPS
high	556 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	472 FPS	647 FPS
1440p
low	704 FPS	669 FPS
medium	565 FPS	617 FPS
high	490 FPS	586 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	530 FPS
4K
low	510 FPS	466 FPS
medium	425 FPS	380 FPS
high	381 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	321 FPS	288 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	859 FPS	669 FPS
medium	802 FPS	669 FPS
high	699 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	628 FPS	663 FPS
1440p
low	760 FPS	669 FPS
medium	678 FPS	669 FPS
high	590 FPS	637 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	526 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	633 FPS
medium	488 FPS	557 FPS
high	437 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	405 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Xeon E5-2699A v4

Core i7-12700K

The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 24.8% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Cores / Threads	12 / 20	22 / 44+83%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+39%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)	55 MB (total)+120%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	34,347+28%	26,759

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2699A v4). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.