PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +80.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Delivers 106.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌
36.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$300 MSRP

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,186 vs 34,347).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +80.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Delivers 106.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌
36.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$300 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,186 vs 34,347).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12700K better than Xeon E5-2667 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2667 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-12700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-12700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 80.3% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700K is the better fit. You are getting 181.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-12700K is 36.3% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it gives you a 80.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 106.7% better value on MSRP (84.0 vs 40.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-12700K Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2667 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	314 FPS	170 FPS
medium	295 FPS	145 FPS
high	246 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	269 FPS	145 FPS
medium	225 FPS	120 FPS
high	182 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	66 FPS
medium	142 FPS	59 FPS
high	109 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	630 FPS	305 FPS
medium	533 FPS	305 FPS
high	450 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	410 FPS	232 FPS
1440p
low	536 FPS	305 FPS
medium	475 FPS	288 FPS
high	403 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	312 FPS	204 FPS
medium	280 FPS	187 FPS
high	266 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	139 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	797 FPS	305 FPS
medium	633 FPS	305 FPS
high	556 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	472 FPS	305 FPS
1440p
low	704 FPS	305 FPS
medium	565 FPS	305 FPS
high	490 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	305 FPS
4K
low	510 FPS	305 FPS
medium	425 FPS	305 FPS
high	381 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	321 FPS	305 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	859 FPS	305 FPS
medium	802 FPS	305 FPS
high	699 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	628 FPS	305 FPS
1440p
low	760 FPS	305 FPS
medium	678 FPS	305 FPS
high	590 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	305 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	305 FPS
medium	488 FPS	305 FPS
high	437 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	305 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Xeon E5-2667 v2

Core i7-12700K

The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Xeon E5-2667 v2's 12,186 — a 95.2% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v2.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Cores / Threads	12 / 20+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+25%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+25%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	34,347+182%	12,186

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2667 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2667 v2) — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2667 v2).

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+159900%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	128	768 GB+629145500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2667 v2). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 debuted at $300. On MSRP ($409 vs $300), the Xeon E5-2667 v2 is $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 40.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — making the Core i7-12700K the 69.6% better value option.