
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,945 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,945 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Xeon E5-1680 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Xeon E5-1680 v4

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Xeon E5-1680 v4
The Xeon E5-1680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,945 points. Launch price was $1,723.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v4 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Xeon E5-1680 v4's 13,945 — a 84.5% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v4.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+6% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+25% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 34,347+146% | 13,945 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-1680 v4). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













