
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 7C13
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,591 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 76,363).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7C13, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅+122.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+924% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,591 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+122.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+924% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 76,363).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7C13, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than EPYC 7C13?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 837 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 698 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 401 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 243 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 977 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 761 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 753 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and EPYC 7C13

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 7C13
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7C13 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 — a 30.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7C13 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the EPYC 7C13's 76,363 — a 75.9% lead for the EPYC 7C13. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 64 / 128+433% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+36% | 3.68 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+924% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 76,363+122% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,538 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 37,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7C13 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7C13 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 8 (EPYC 7C13). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 128 (EPYC 7C13) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and SP3 (EPYC 7C13).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096 GB+3355443100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs AMD-V (EPYC 7C13). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7C13 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 7C13 debuted at $2000. On MSRP ($409 vs $2000), the Core i7-12700K is $1591 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 38.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7C13 — making the Core i7-12700K the 75% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-80% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+120% | 38.2 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













