
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 228V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌38.6% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$295 MSRP
- ❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-12700K
2021Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌38.6% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$295 MSRP
- ❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core Ultra 5 228V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 408 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Core Ultra 5 228V

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 5 228V
Core Ultra 5 228V
The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 67.8% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+50% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+11% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+213% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | 3 nm-70% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 34,347+103% | 16,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,932 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,585 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,053 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 228V — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-12700K supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) — the Core i7-12700K offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 32 GB+26214300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and Arc 130V (Core Ultra 5 228V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Arc 130V |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 228V debuted at $295. On MSRP ($409 vs $295), the Core Ultra 5 228V is $114 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 57.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 228V — making the Core i7-12700K the 37.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $295-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+46% | 57.5 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













