
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 5 225F
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $178 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,541 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021Core Ultra 5 225F
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $178 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,541 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core Ultra 5 225F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 789 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 777 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 699 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 402 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Core Ultra 5 225F

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 5 225F
Core Ultra 5 225F
The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 31,541 — a 8.5% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+20% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+25% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+140% |
| Process | 10 nm | 3 nm-70% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,347+9% | 31,541 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,050 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,653 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,028 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225F — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225F) — the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 256 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 5 225F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 5 225F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225F debuted at $231. On MSRP ($409 vs $231), the Core Ultra 5 225F is $178 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 136.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225F — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 47.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $231-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0 | 136.5+63% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













