
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-14900HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $259 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 44,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-12700K
2021Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $259 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 44,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Core i7-12700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 761 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 334 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 1001 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 896 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 783 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 696 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 831 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Core i9-14900HX

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-14900HX offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX — a 13.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-14900HX uses Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Core i9-14900HX's 44,685 — a 26.2% lead for the Core i9-14900HX. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 24 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+44% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 44,685+30% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 35,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-14900HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-14900HX — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 192 GB+157286300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Flagship Gaming Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-14900HX debuted at $668. On MSRP ($409 vs $668), the Core i7-12700K is $259 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 66.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900HX — making the Core i7-12700K the 22.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-39% | $668 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+26% | 66.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













