
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-10900K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-10900K
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,382 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-12700K
2021Core i9-10900K
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,382 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i9-10900K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 215 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 560 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Core i9-10900K

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
The Core i9-10900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,382 points. Launch price was $488.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-10900K offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900K — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-10900K uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Core i9-10900K's 22,382 — a 42.2% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900K.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+20% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.2 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+25% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,347+53% | 22,382 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900K uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900K — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 16 (Core i9-10900K) — the Core i7-12700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and Intel 400 series (Core i9-10900K).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10900K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900K debuted at $499. On MSRP ($409 vs $499), the Core i7-12700K is $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900K — making the Core i7-12700K the 60.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-18% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+87% | 44.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













