
Core i7-6700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-6700K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 91W instead of 125W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,933 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +67.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 229.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌16.9% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌37.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 91W.
Core i7-6700K
2015Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 91W instead of 125W, a 34W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +67.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 229.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,933 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌16.9% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌37.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 91W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i7-6700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 802 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 628 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700K and Core i7-12700K

Core i7-6700K
Core i7-6700K
The Core i7-6700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 August 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 91 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,933 points. Launch price was $339.

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6700K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-12700K offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-6700K versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-6700K uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-12700K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700K scores 8,933 against the Core i7-12700K's 34,347 — a 117.4% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700K vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 20+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+213% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 8,933 | 34,347+284% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-12700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-6700K versus 4800 on the Core i7-12700K — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-12700K supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-6700K) vs 20 (Core i7-12700K) — the Core i7-12700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+52428700% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 530 (Core i7-6700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-6700K launched at $350 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($350 vs $409), the Core i7-6700K is $59 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700K delivers 25.5 pts/$ vs 84.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700K — making the Core i7-12700K the 106.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-14% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.5 | 84.0+229% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












