
Core i5-13490F
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13490F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($235 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 113.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($235 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,670 vs 34,347).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13490F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 113.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13490F.
Core i5-13490F
2023Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($235 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 113.5 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($235 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13490F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,670 vs 34,347).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 113.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13490F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i5-13490F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 667 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 667 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 667 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 667 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 667 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 596 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 667 FPS | 802 FPS |
| high | 667 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 667 FPS | 628 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 667 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 667 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 592 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 661 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13490F and Core i7-12700K

Core i5-13490F
Core i5-13490F
The Core i5-13490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,670 points. Launch price was $235.

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-12700K offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13490F versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13490F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-12700K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13490F scores 26,670 against the Core i7-12700K's 34,347 — a 25.2% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13490F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 20+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+4% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 26,670 | 34,347+29% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,844 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13490F versus 4800 on the Core i7-12700K — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13490F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B660,B760,H610,H670,Z690,Z790 (Core i5-13490F) and Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K).
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13490F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13490F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13490F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13490F launched at $235 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($235 vs $409), the Core i5-13490F is $174 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13490F delivers 113.5 pts/$ vs 84.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700K — making the Core i5-13490F the 29.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $235-43% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 113.5+35% | 84.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













