
Core i5-13400E
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.2 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,000 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 122.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Core i5-13400E
2023Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.2 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,000 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 122.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i5-13400E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 802 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 648 FPS | 628 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400E and Core i7-12700K

Core i5-13400E
Core i5-13400E
The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-12700K offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-12700K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Core i7-12700K's 34,347 — a 24% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 20+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,000 | 34,347+27% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,953 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,375 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,977 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400E versus 4800 on the Core i7-12700K — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K).
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400E launched at $221 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($221 vs $409), the Core i5-13400E is $188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400E delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 84.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700K — making the Core i5-13400E the 37.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221-46% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2+45% | 84.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













