
Core i5-13600H
Popular choices:

Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,291 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-13600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Core i5-13600H
2023Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,291 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-13600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i5-13600H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 238 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 941 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 923 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 831 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 850 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600H and Core i5-13600K

Core i5-13600H
Core i5-13600H
The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 47.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 14 / 20+17% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,291 | 37,655+62% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,857 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,423 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,684 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i5-13600H) vs 20 (Core i5-13600K) — the Core i5-13600H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 192 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Core i5-13600H) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop, Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High performance laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













