
Core i5-13400E
Popular choices:

Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $108 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,000 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌48.9% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$221 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Core i5-13400E
2023Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $108 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,000 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌48.9% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$221 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i5-13400E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 238 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 941 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 923 FPS |
| ultra | 648 FPS | 831 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 850 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400E and Core i5-13600K

Core i5-13400E
Core i5-13400E
The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 33% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 27,000 | 37,655+39% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,953 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,375 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,977 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K).
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity, Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Productivity | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400E launched at $221 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600K debuted at $329. On MSRP ($221 vs $329), the Core i5-13400E is $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400E delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600K — making the Core i5-13400E the 6.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221-33% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2+7% | 114.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













