
Core i5-11320H
Popular choices:

Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11320H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,879 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +117.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Core i5-11320H
2021Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +117.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,879 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i5-11320H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 238 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 941 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 923 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 831 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 850 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11320H and Core i5-13600K

Core i5-11320H
Core i5-11320H
The Core i5-11320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11320H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11320H versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-11320H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11320H scores 10,879 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 110.3% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11320H vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 14 / 20+250% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 24 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 10,879 | 37,655+246% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,852 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,447 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,633 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11320H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11320H versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i5-11320H) and Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K).
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-11320H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11320H) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) (Core i5-11320H) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11320H targets Productivity, Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-11320H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Productivity | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












