PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 730, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,953 vs 16,211).
❌
12.8% HIGHER MSRP
$221 MSRPvs$196 MSRP

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400E across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13400E

2023

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 730, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,953 vs 16,211).
❌
12.8% HIGHER MSRP
$221 MSRPvs$196 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400E across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-13400E?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-13400E is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 1.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $25 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it gives you 1.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Core i5-13400E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 4.5% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 122.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400E Benchmark Check

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400E	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	167 FPS	171 FPS
medium	151 FPS	158 FPS
high	126 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	143 FPS
medium	120 FPS	123 FPS
high	97 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	81 FPS
medium	70 FPS	74 FPS
high	56 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-13400E Open Core i5-13400F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400E	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	570 FPS	545 FPS
medium	487 FPS	464 FPS
high	408 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	369 FPS	356 FPS
1440p
low	487 FPS	458 FPS
medium	429 FPS	403 FPS
high	368 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	317 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	298 FPS	280 FPS
medium	264 FPS	247 FPS
high	246 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core i5-13400E Open Core i5-13400F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400E	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	675 FPS	530 FPS
medium	564 FPS	449 FPS
high	516 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	451 FPS	375 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	490 FPS
medium	508 FPS	422 FPS
high	455 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	398 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	464 FPS	393 FPS
medium	381 FPS	331 FPS
high	337 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	276 FPS	246 FPS

Open Core i5-13400E Open Core i5-13400F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400E	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	675 FPS	626 FPS
medium	675 FPS	626 FPS
high	675 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	648 FPS	626 FPS
1440p
low	675 FPS	626 FPS
medium	675 FPS	626 FPS
high	604 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	530 FPS	521 FPS
4K
low	542 FPS	535 FPS
medium	497 FPS	492 FPS
high	444 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i5-13400E Open Core i5-13400F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400E and Core i5-13400F

Core i5-13400E

The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-13400E and Core i5-13400F share an identical 10-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 7.6% lead for the Core i5-13400E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,953 vs 16,211 (1.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,375 vs 2,407, a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,977 vs 11,408 (13.4% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	27,000+8%	25,029
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,953	16,211+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,375	2,407+1%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,977	11,408+14%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i5-13400E includes integrated graphics (UHD 730), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD 730	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Productivity	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400E launched at $221 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. On MSRP ($221 vs $196), the Core i5-13400F is $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400E delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 4.4% better value option.