
Core i5-13400
Popular choices:

Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,769 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 107.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+5.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 107.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13400.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-13400
2023Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+5.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 107.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13400.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,769 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 107.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-13400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 594 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400 and Core i5-13400F

Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
The Core i5-13400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,769 points. Launch price was $221.

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-13400 and Core i5-13400F share an identical 10-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400 scores 23,769 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 5.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 23,769 | 25,029+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13400) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400 launched at $221 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. On MSRP ($221 vs $196), the Core i5-13400F is $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400 delivers 107.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 17.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221 | $196-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.6 | 127.7+19% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












