PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-1250P

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,250 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +93.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-1250P.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i5-1250P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-1250P

2022

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +93.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-1250P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,250 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i5-1250P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-1250P?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 93.4% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 75.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 30.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 93.4% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 75.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 93.4% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-1250P Benchmark Check

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-1250P	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	169 FPS	171 FPS
medium	151 FPS	158 FPS
high	123 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	143 FPS
medium	122 FPS	123 FPS
high	98 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	81 FPS
medium	74 FPS	74 FPS
high	59 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-1250P Open Core i5-13400F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-1250P	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	195 FPS	545 FPS
medium	166 FPS	464 FPS
high	153 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	356 FPS
1440p
low	172 FPS	458 FPS
medium	150 FPS	403 FPS
high	141 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	139 FPS	280 FPS
medium	125 FPS	247 FPS
high	119 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core i5-1250P Open Core i5-13400F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-1250P	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	479 FPS	530 FPS
medium	479 FPS	449 FPS
high	461 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	406 FPS	375 FPS
1440p
low	479 FPS	490 FPS
medium	465 FPS	422 FPS
high	415 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	367 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	435 FPS	393 FPS
medium	356 FPS	331 FPS
high	315 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	257 FPS	246 FPS

Open Core i5-1250P Open Core i5-13400F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-1250P	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	479 FPS	626 FPS
medium	479 FPS	626 FPS
high	479 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	479 FPS	626 FPS
1440p
low	479 FPS	626 FPS
medium	479 FPS	626 FPS
high	479 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	448 FPS	521 FPS
4K
low	470 FPS	535 FPS
medium	427 FPS	492 FPS
high	375 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i5-1250P Open Core i5-13400F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1250P and Core i5-13400F

Core i5-1250P

The Core i5-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1250P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-1250P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1250P versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-1250P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1250P scores 19,167 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 26.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,250 vs 16,211 (54.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,785 vs 2,407, a 29.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,420 vs 11,408 (30.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1250P vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i5-1250P	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	12 / 16+20%	10 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.6 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.5 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-P (2022)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	19,167	25,029+31%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,250	16,211+75%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,785	2,407+35%
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,420	11,408+35%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1250P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: BGA1744 (Core i5-1250P) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i5-1250P	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	192 GB+200%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-1250P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-1250P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.