PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,503 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +118.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 39.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
102.1% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$97 MSRP

Core i3-10105F

2021

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +118.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 39.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,503 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌
102.1% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$97 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i3-10105F?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 118.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 153.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 180.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 118.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 153.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is 102.1% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $97 MSRP, and it gives you a 118.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 39.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 91.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i3-10105F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i3-10105F Benchmark Check

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	181 FPS	171 FPS
medium	143 FPS	158 FPS
high	113 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	143 FPS
medium	119 FPS	123 FPS
high	95 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	81 FPS
medium	72 FPS	74 FPS
high	57 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i5-13400F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	223 FPS	545 FPS
medium	223 FPS	464 FPS
high	206 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	356 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	458 FPS
medium	203 FPS	403 FPS
high	184 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	280 FPS
medium	164 FPS	247 FPS
high	139 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i5-13400F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	223 FPS	530 FPS
medium	223 FPS	449 FPS
high	223 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	375 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	490 FPS
medium	223 FPS	422 FPS
high	223 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	223 FPS	393 FPS
medium	223 FPS	331 FPS
high	223 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	246 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i5-13400F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i5-13400F
1080p
low	223 FPS	626 FPS
medium	223 FPS	626 FPS
high	223 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	626 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	626 FPS
medium	223 FPS	626 FPS
high	223 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	521 FPS
4K
low	223 FPS	535 FPS
medium	223 FPS	492 FPS
high	223 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i5-13400F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10105F and Core i5-13400F

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 95% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,461 vs 2,407, a 48.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,503 vs 11,408 (86.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 16+150%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.6 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+48%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	8,912	25,029+181%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	1,461	2,407+65%
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,503	11,408+153%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10105F versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10105F) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i3-10105F) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-10105F launched at $97 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. On MSRP ($97 vs $196), the Core i3-10105F is $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 32.6% better value option.