Core 3 100HL vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core 3 100HL

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i5-13400F
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $110 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
  • Delivers 122.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core 3 100HL?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 14.8% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data and 42.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.8% more average FPS across 11 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 42.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $110 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $306 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 122.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 100HL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
1080p
low177 FPS171 FPS
medium144 FPS158 FPS
high119 FPS132 FPS
ultra97 FPS112 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS143 FPS
medium114 FPS123 FPS
high94 FPS99 FPS
ultra77 FPS84 FPS
4K
low79 FPS81 FPS
medium68 FPS74 FPS
high54 FPS59 FPS
ultra43 FPS46 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
1080p
low201 FPS545 FPS
medium171 FPS464 FPS
high155 FPS389 FPS
ultra136 FPS356 FPS
1440p
low177 FPS458 FPS
medium155 FPS403 FPS
high143 FPS345 FPS
ultra123 FPS301 FPS
4K
low138 FPS280 FPS
medium125 FPS247 FPS
high118 FPS231 FPS
ultra102 FPS204 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
1080p
low440 FPS530 FPS
medium440 FPS449 FPS
high440 FPS415 FPS
ultra440 FPS375 FPS
1440p
low440 FPS490 FPS
medium440 FPS422 FPS
high440 FPS382 FPS
ultra387 FPS343 FPS
4K
low439 FPS393 FPS
medium350 FPS331 FPS
high312 FPS296 FPS
ultra246 FPS246 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
1080p
low440 FPS626 FPS
medium440 FPS626 FPS
high440 FPS626 FPS
ultra440 FPS626 FPS
1440p
low440 FPS626 FPS
medium440 FPS626 FPS
high440 FPS598 FPS
ultra440 FPS521 FPS
4K
low440 FPS535 FPS
medium440 FPS492 FPS
high440 FPS439 FPS
ultra391 FPS382 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100HL and Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 34.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
8 / 12
10 / 16+25%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
17,586
25,029+42%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 100HL) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 3 100HL launched at $306 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. On MSRP ($306 vs $196), the Core i5-13400F is $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 100HL delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 75.9% better value option.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
MSRP
$306
$196-36%
Performance per Dollar
57.5
127.7+122%
Release Date
2024
2023