
Core i5-1250P
Popular choices:

Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1250P
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,250 vs 12,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-1250P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-1250P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1250P
2022Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-1250P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,250 vs 12,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-1250P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i5-1250P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 196 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1250P and Core i5-12400F

Core i5-1250P
Core i5-1250P
The Core i5-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1250P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-1250P has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1250P versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-1250P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1250P scores 19,167 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,250 vs 12,380 (28.9% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,785 vs 1,700, a 4.9% lead for the Core i5-1250P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,420 vs 657 (171% advantage for the Core i5-1250P). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1250P vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.5 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 19,167 | 19,532+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,250 | 12,380+34% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,785+5% | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,420+1182% | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1250P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: BGA1744 (Core i5-1250P) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1250P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The Core i5-1250P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













