
Core i5-11500H
Popular choices:

Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11500H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750 (32 EU), while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,532 vs 12,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-11500H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-11500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11500H
2021Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750 (32 EU), while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-11500H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,532 vs 12,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-11500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i5-11500H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11500H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11500H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 196 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11500H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11500H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11500H and Core i5-12400F

Core i5-11500H
Core i5-11500H
The Core i5-11500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,669 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-11500H and Core i5-12400F share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500H versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-11500H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-11500H uses the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500H scores 15,669 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 21.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,532 vs 12,380 (26% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,801 vs 1,700, a 5.8% lead for the Core i5-11500H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,248 vs 657 (161.9% advantage for the Core i5-11500H). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11500H vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i5-11500H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+5% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+16% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake H45 (2021) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 15,669 | 19,532+25% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,532 | 12,380+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,801+6% | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,248+851% | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11500H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11500H versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i5-11500H) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Core i5-11500H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-11500H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750 (32 EU)), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500H targets Gaming, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-11500H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-11500H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 (32 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












