
Core i3-10100F
Popular choices:

Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-10100F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $86 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,714 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 99.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +101.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 99.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌97.7% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$88 MSRP
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Core i3-10100F
2020Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $86 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +101.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 99.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,714 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 99.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌97.7% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$88 MSRP
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i3-10100F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 196 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10100F and Core i5-12400F

Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F
The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-10100F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100F scores 8,714 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 76.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 18 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 8,714 | 19,532+124% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10100F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10100F versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10100F) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 series (Core i3-10100F) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-10100F) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-10100F launched at $88 MSRP, while the Core i5-12400F debuted at $174. On MSRP ($88 vs $174), the Core i3-10100F is $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10100F delivers 99.0 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 12.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $88-49% | $174 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.0 | 112.3+13% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












