Core 3 100HL vs Core i5-12400F

Intel

Core 3 100HL

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i5-12400F
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 19,532).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $132 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
  • Delivers 95.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core 3 100HL?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 25.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data and 11.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.7% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 11.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is $132 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $306 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 95.3% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 100HL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
1080p
low177 FPS183 FPS
medium144 FPS168 FPS
high119 FPS139 FPS
ultra97 FPS119 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS153 FPS
medium114 FPS132 FPS
high94 FPS106 FPS
ultra77 FPS89 FPS
4K
low79 FPS87 FPS
medium68 FPS81 FPS
high54 FPS64 FPS
ultra43 FPS49 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
1080p
low201 FPS471 FPS
medium171 FPS397 FPS
high155 FPS341 FPS
ultra136 FPS301 FPS
1440p
low177 FPS407 FPS
medium155 FPS351 FPS
high143 FPS309 FPS
ultra123 FPS265 FPS
4K
low138 FPS282 FPS
medium125 FPS248 FPS
high118 FPS229 FPS
ultra102 FPS196 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
1080p
low440 FPS488 FPS
medium440 FPS488 FPS
high440 FPS488 FPS
ultra440 FPS488 FPS
1440p
low440 FPS488 FPS
medium440 FPS488 FPS
high440 FPS485 FPS
ultra387 FPS434 FPS
4K
low439 FPS442 FPS
medium350 FPS389 FPS
high312 FPS337 FPS
ultra246 FPS274 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
1080p
low440 FPS488 FPS
medium440 FPS488 FPS
high440 FPS488 FPS
ultra440 FPS488 FPS
1440p
low440 FPS488 FPS
medium440 FPS488 FPS
high440 FPS488 FPS
ultra440 FPS473 FPS
4K
low440 FPS488 FPS
medium440 FPS450 FPS
high440 FPS391 FPS
ultra391 FPS330 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100HL and Core i5-12400F

Intel

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 3 100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core 3 100HL (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 10.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
8 / 12+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+5%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
18 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
17,586
19,532+11%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 100HL) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 3 100HL launched at $306 MSRP, while the Core i5-12400F debuted at $174. On MSRP ($306 vs $174), the Core i5-12400F is $132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 100HL delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 64.6% better value option.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-12400F
MSRP
$306
$174-43%
Performance per Dollar
57.5
112.3+95%
Release Date
2024
2022